<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rowan Mangan &#187; Books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rowanmangan.com/category/books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rowanmangan.com</link>
	<description>Cloud Gazer, Book Reader, Friend to Dogs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:40:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>On books, and lists of books</title>
		<link>http://www.rowanmangan.com/2010/on-books-and-lists-of-books/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.rowanmangan.com/2010/on-books-and-lists-of-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rowan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rowanmangan.com/?p=332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Kat posted a list of ‘should-reads’ from the BBC and noted what she’d read, what she hasn’t but wants to, and what she hasn’t and doesn’t want to. I think this activity should become a meme – it has reminded me of books I love and books I still want to read. And reread.
Following Kat’s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://www.rowanmangan.com/2010/on-books-and-lists-of-books/" title="Permanent link to On books, and lists of books"><img class="post_image alignleft remove_bottom_margin" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/187/398144161_1111bdfd66.jpg" width="500" height="427" alt="Great books?" /></a>
</p><p>Kat <a href="http://mnememe.blogspot.com/2010/01/bbc-100-books-you-should-read.html">posted a list</a> of ‘should-reads’ from the BBC and noted what she’d read, what she hasn’t but wants to, and what she hasn’t and doesn’t want to. I think this activity should become a meme – it has reminded me of books I love and books I still want to read. And reread.</p>
<p>Following Kat’s legend, <strong>bold</strong> means I’ve read it and unbold (shy?) means I haven’t.</p>
<p><strong>1. Pride and Prejudice &#8211; </strong><strong>Jane Austen<br />
2. The Lord of the Rings &#8211; JRR Tolkien<br />
3. Jane Eyre &#8211; Charlotte Bronte<br />
4. Harry Potter series &#8211; JK Rowling<br />
5. To Kill a Mockingbird &#8211; Harper Lee<br />
</strong>6. The Bible (spoilers abound, I’ve heard the ending)<br />
<strong>7. Wuthering Heights &#8211; Emily Bronte<br />
8. Nineteen Eighty Four &#8211; George Orwell<br />
9. His Dark Materials &#8211; Philip Pullman<br />
</strong>10. Great Expectations &#8211; Charles Dickens (how have I not read this yet? List!)<br />
<strong>11. Little Women &#8211; Louisa M Alcott<br />
</strong>12. Tess of the D’Urbervilles &#8211; Thomas Hardy (I know, I know…)<br />
<strong>13. Catch 22 &#8211; Joseph Heller</strong><br />
14. Complete Works of Shakespeare &#8211; (nope, not all of it. Not yet.)<br />
<strong>15. Rebecca &#8211; Daphne Du Maurier<br />
16. The Hobbit &#8211; JRR Tolkien </strong><br />
<strong>17. Birdsong &#8211; Sebastian Faulk<br />
18. Catcher in the Rye &#8211; JD Salinger<br />
19. The Time Traveler’s Wife &#8211; Audrey Niffenegger<br />
</strong>20. Middlemarch &#8211; George Eliot<br />
21. Gone With The Wind &#8211; Margaret Mitchell<br />
<strong>22. The Great Gatsby &#8211; F. Scott Fitzgerald<br />
</strong>23. Bleak House &#8211; Charles Dickens (Got to improve my Dickens ratings – this is unforgivable!)<br />
24. War and Peace &#8211; Leo Tolstoy (One of these days; doorstop)<br />
<strong>25. The Hitch Hiker’s Guide to the Galaxy &#8211; Douglas Adams</strong><br />
27. Crime and Punishment &#8211; Fyodor Dostoyevsky<br />
28. Grapes of Wrath &#8211; John Steinbeck<br />
<strong>29. Alice in Wonderland &#8211; Lewis Carroll<br />
30. The Wind in the Willows &#8211; Kenneth Grahame<br />
</strong>31. Anna Karenina &#8211; Leo Tolstoy<br />
<strong>32. David Copperfield &#8211; Charles Dickens<br />
33. Chronicles of Narnia &#8211; CS Lewis<br />
34. Emma &#8211; Jane Austen<br />
35. Persuasion &#8211; Jane Austen<br />
36. The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe &#8211; CS Lewis<br />
37. The Kite Runner &#8211; Khaled Hosseini<br />
38. Captain Corelli’s Mandolin &#8211; Louis De Bernieres<br />
39. Memoirs of a Geisha &#8211; Arthur Golden<br />
40. Winnie the Pooh &#8211; AA Milne<br />
41. Animal Farm &#8211; George Orwell<br />
42. The Da Vinci Code &#8211; Dan Brown </strong><br />
<strong>43. One Hundred Years of Solitude &#8211; Gabriel Garcia Marquez<br />
</strong>44. A Prayer for Owen Meany &#8211; John Irving<br />
45. The Woman in White &#8211; Wilkie Collins<br />
<strong>46. Anne of Green Gables &#8211; LM Montgomery </strong><br />
47. Far From The Madding Crowd &#8211; Thomas Hardy<br />
<strong>48. The Handmaid’s Tale &#8211; Margaret Atwood<br />
49. Lord of the Flies &#8211; William Golding<br />
50. Atonement &#8211; Ian McEwan<br />
51. Life of Pi &#8211; Yann Martel<br />
</strong>52. Dune &#8211; Frank Herbert<br />
53. Cold Comfort Farm &#8211; Stella Gibbons<br />
<strong>54. Sense and Sensibility &#8211; Jane Austen</strong><br />
55. A Suitable Boy &#8211; Vikram Seth (started this but had to return it. I’ve loved some of his other books.)<br />
56. The Shadow of the Wind &#8211; Carlos Ruiz Zafon<br />
57. A Tale Of Two Cities &#8211; Charles Dickens<br />
<strong>58. Brave New World &#8211; Aldous Huxley<br />
59. The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night Time &#8211; Mark Haddon<br />
60. Love In The Time Of Cholera &#8211; Gabriel Garcia Marquez<br />
</strong>61. Of Mice and Men &#8211; John Steinbeck<br />
<strong>62. Lolita &#8211; Vladimir Nabokov<br />
63. The Secret History &#8211; Donna Tartt<br />
64. The Lovely Bones &#8211; Alice Sebold<br />
</strong>65. Count of Monte Cristo &#8211; Alexandre Dumas<br />
<strong>66. On The Road &#8211; Jack Kerouac</strong><br />
67. Jude the Obscure &#8211; Thomas Hardy<br />
<strong>68. Bridget Jones’s Diary &#8211; Helen Fielding<br />
69. Midnight’s Children &#8211; Salman Rushdie</strong><br />
70. Moby Dick &#8211; Herman Melville (this is embarrassing!)<br />
<strong>71. Oliver Twist &#8211; Charles Dickens<br />
72. Dracula &#8211; Bram Stoker<br />
73. The Secret Garden &#8211; Frances Hodgson Burnett<br />
74. Notes From A Small Island &#8211; Bill Bryson</strong><br />
75. Ulysses &#8211; James Joyce<br />
76. The Inferno &#8211; Dante<br />
<strong>77. Swallows and Amazons &#8211; Arthur Ransome<br />
</strong>78. Germinal &#8211; Emile Zola<br />
79. Vanity Fair &#8211; William Makepeace Thackeray<br />
80. Possession &#8211; AS Byatt<br />
<strong>81. A Christmas Carol &#8211; Charles Dickens<br />
</strong>82. Cloud Atlas &#8211; David Mitchell<br />
<strong>83. The Color Purple &#8211; Alice Walker</strong> (didn’t like this. Have issues with Alice Walker)<br />
84. The Remains of the Day &#8211; Kazuo Ishiguro (MUST READ!)<br />
85. Madame Bovary &#8211; Gustave Flaubert<br />
86. A Fine Balance &#8211; Rohinton Mistry (urg, have started at least three times…)<br />
<strong>87. Charlotte’s Web &#8211; EB White<br />
88. The Five People You Meet In Heaven &#8211; Mitch Albom</strong> (AWFUL American tripe)<br />
89. Adventures of Sherlock Holmes &#8211; Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (Wow, have I really not?)<br />
<strong>90. The Faraway Tree Collection &#8211; Enid Blyton<br />
91. Heart of Darkness &#8211; Joseph Conrad<br />
92. The Little Prince &#8211; Antoine De Saint-Exupery<br />
93. The Wasp Factory &#8211; Iain Banks<br />
94. Watership Down &#8211; Richard Adams </strong>(Oh how I love this book!)<br />
95. A Confederacy of Dunces &#8211; John Kennedy Toole<br />
96. A Town Like Alice &#8211; Nevil Shute<br />
97. The Three Musketeers &#8211; Alexandre Dumas<br />
<strong>98. Hamlet &#8211; William Shakespeare<br />
99. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory &#8211; Roald Dahl<br />
100. Les Miserables &#8211; Victor Hugo </strong>(Good but not a patch on the musical…)</p>
<p>I’ve got just over half (about 56) under my belt. And nothing in there that I don’t want to read, which is a nice feeling (the ones I don’t want to read, unfortunately, I’ve already read).</p>
<p>Based on this, in 2010 I am going to try and read (more):</p>
<ul>
<li>Dickens</li>
<li>Russians</li>
<li>Ulysses, finally</li>
<li>Remains of the Day</li>
<li>Sherlock Holmes</li>
<li>Steinbeck</li>
</ul>
<p>Kat points out the problematic notion that you have to read a specific collection of books to be well-read (or whatever). I agree with her, but I also subscribe to the idea of the canon – as long as it’s a flexible, self-determined one. I like the idea of a literary heritage, that we inherit great tales, that there’s some kind of inter-generational continuity where stories are concerned. In fact, the nice thing about this list is its combination of contemporary and historical books.</p>
<p>I think that we can share a lot through stories, that we can tap into the zeitgeist, the ideas that are circulating the planet, the thoughts people are thinking and were thinking. Maybe reading some of these “greats” is the equivalent of checking the newsfeed on Facebook – checking in with the larger vibe. Except you get to check everyone’s best updates, none of the ‘this milkshake tastes like ass’ bits. (Although, as loyal readers know, the books representing those quotidian updates are also enjoyed by me on a regular basis.)</p>
<p>My approval of the canon may seem to be at odds with <a href="http://www.rowanmangan.com/2009/the-average-novel/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">views I’ve previously expressed</a>, but to me there’s no paradox. I love ephemeral stories and I love stories that last forever. They aren’t the same thing, but also… they are the same thing.</p>
<p>I’m in favour of stories.</p>
<p>What about you?</p>
<p>What do you think about these sorts of lists? Do they serve a purpose, or do they just make some people feel smug and some feel inferior? Why do we read, anyway? What’s a bestseller doing?</p>
<p><a href="http://whereissarah.wordpress.com/">Sarah</a>, <a href="http://peasoupoftheday.blogspot.com/">Suse</a>, <a href="http://web.mac.com/b1b2/blah/blog/blog.html">Blair</a>, you’re tagged. Blogless friends, anonymous readers, what do you folks read and what you make of it all?<br />
<small><a title="Attribution License" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.rowanmangan.com/wp-content/plugins/photo-dropper/images/cc.png" border="0" alt="Creative Commons License" width="16" height="16" align="absmiddle" /></a> <a href="http://www.photodropper.com/photos/" target="_blank">photo</a> credit: <a title="guldfisken" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/92269864@N00/398144161/" target="_blank">guldfisken</a></small></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookdepository.co.uk/ref/rowanperiphery/ecde32b2.aff"><img title="The BookDepository" src="http://affiliates.bookdepository.co.uk/accounts/default1/banners/468-x-60.jpg" alt="The BookDepository" width="468" height="60" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rowanmangan.com/2010/on-books-and-lists-of-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In defence of the average novel</title>
		<link>http://www.rowanmangan.com/2009/the-average-novel/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://www.rowanmangan.com/2009/the-average-novel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rowan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rowanmangan.com/?p=130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don't criticise books for the fun of it. Read books for the fun of it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p style="text-align: center;">
<p style="text-align: right;"><small><a title="TheReader1" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/78667938@N00/3937111288/" target="_blank"><img class="aligncenter" style="border: 0pt none;" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3534/3937111288_d01916c4e5.jpg" border="0" alt="TheReader1" width="500" height="337" /></a><small><a title="macfanmd" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/78667938@N00/3937111288/" target="_blank"></a></small> </small></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>This is going to be a bit of a rant.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I&#8217;ve recently experienced a series of interactions with friends and acquaintances in response to my raving about some book I was reading. The conversation usually goes one of two ways:</p>
<h2 style="text-align: left;">Conversation #1</h2>
<p><strong>Me</strong>: I love this book! It makes me want to become a brittle-yet-vulnerable forensic psychologist (for example) who solves murders in the nick of time.</p>
<p><strong>My friend</strong>: Mmm. I don&#8217;t know, I thought the book was a bit obvious, didn&#8217;t you? And it was so <em>unlikely</em>, you know, all those convenient coincidences. And the love-interest subplot? Predictable.</p>
<p><strong>Me</strong>: Ohhh. I thought that was nice. You know, how she saved his life, and then he saved her life, and then they both saved the killer&#8217;s life together so that justice could be served in a court of law?</p>
<p><strong>My friend</strong>: It&#8217;s probably just me. I just think it didn&#8217;t compare to [trendy writer]&#8217;s book, which was so gritty and urban. So real. And yet at the same time, a metaphor for today&#8217;s world, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
<h2 style="text-align: left;">Conversation #2</h2>
<p><strong>Me:</strong> I&#8217;m reading [average novel example] and can&#8217;t put it down.</p>
<p><strong>My friend</strong>: You <em>read</em> that sh*t?</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Me</strong>: &#8230;</p>
<p><a title="Some of my books" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/10229695@N08/2146799807/" target="_blank"><img class="alignleft" style="border: 0pt none;" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2119/2146799807_f8a3f7b920_m.jpg" border="0" alt="Some of my books" width="240" height="180" /></a><small><a title="Secret Pilgrim" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/10229695@N08/2146799807/" target="_blank"></a></small></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my thing: I don&#8217;t think reading novels should be hard work, not if the work isn&#8217;t dwarfed by the enjoyment you get from it. I don&#8217;t think books should be notches on an intellectual bedpost. I don&#8217;t think they should be used as the currency of culture &#8211; or cool &#8211; either.</p>
<p>I heard about an architect &#8211; maybe Jørn Utzon &#8211; who said that his aim in creating new spaces was to allow people to think new thoughts. That&#8217;s what a good novel does for me. It puts new pictures into my head and introduces me to new people and make me <em>feel</em> stuff.</p>
<p>There are plenty of crap novels out there. <em>Really</em> bad ones, the literary lovechildren of Dan Brown and Matthew Reilly (I should know, I&#8217;ve read most of them). But for me, the litmus test there is whether or not I&#8217;m convinced by the story. That&#8217;s it. If it&#8217;s reeeeally badly written, or if the characters are preposterous, or the plot is overly contrived, then it&#8217;s not fun. On the other hand, surely the unwritten contract between the author and us as readers involves us suspending our disbelief to some degree.</p>
<p>The way I see it, you should only be allowed to rubbish a novel if you started it with the intention of enjoying it. Cynicism is a self-fulfilling prophecy.</p>
<p>I think people become addicted to criticising things. Maybe it&#8217;s the way we&#8217;re educated: you get into a rhythm or a pattern of looking for the defects, the &#8216;Aha!&#8217;, something to write in the essay. I&#8217;ve always been the opposite. In any given situation I tend to dole out more than enough benefit of the doubt to go around.</p>
<p>That said, I understand the importance of criticism and think that where it&#8217;s thoughtful, it&#8217;s priceless. I&#8217;m not advocating being nice about everything.</p>
<p><a title="book shelf project 1 ~ striatic {notes}" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/34427466731@N01/729822/" target="_blank"><img class="alignright" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/1/729822_25ba163c9a_m.jpg" border="0" alt="book shelf project 1 ~ striatic {notes}" /></a> <small> </small></p>
<p>What is increasingly pissing me off, though, is what I see as being people bigging themselves up via putting down other people&#8217;s work. It becomes a bit like racism or other forms of prejudice that work psychologically to affirm one&#8217;s own rightness (or <em>right-on</em>ness!).  And it seems to me that a quasi-intellectual objection to a &#8216;low-brow&#8217; novel is often meant to belittle those  who enjoy it (ok, me) as much as its author.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;ve reached my tipping point. From here on in I&#8217;m going to be more forthright than ever about fun books without intellectual pretensions.  If I inhale a Nick Hornby or a Val McDermid or a Nicholas Evans, I&#8217;m going to go there, girlfriend. <em>Oh yes I di-id</em>.</p>
<p>Rant over. Thoughts?</p>
<h6>(Photo credits: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/striatic/">Striatic</a>, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/umdrums/">Secret Pilgrim</a>, <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/sookie/">416style, macfanmd</a>)</h6>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.bookdepository.co.uk/ref/rowanperiphery/ecde32b2.aff"><img class="aligncenter" title="The BookDepository" src="http://affiliates.bookdepository.co.uk/accounts/default1/banners/468-x-60.jpg" alt="The BookDepository" width="468" height="60" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rowanmangan.com/2009/the-average-novel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
